Running Head: Breaking the Technology Barrier
Breaking the Technology Barrier: Using Technology in Education
Patrick Wellert
ETC 558
Northern Arizona University
Abstract
It has long been difficult for teachers to effectively communicate the objectives and goals in a fun and exciting way that reaches the students. In the changing times teachers need to find ways to include students into the lesson using the technology made available to them. It has long been believed that teachers need to get over their fear and use technology openly with students in order to meet their educational needs. By including students into the lessons teachers will experience a more positive classroom experience.
Breaking the Technology Barrier: Using Technology in Education
Technology and education have always seemed to go together. In order to prepare students for the workplace or college they need to be able to be exposed to it. Teachers in the classroom use technology believing that the students are gaining valuable information and retaining the concepts taught but in reality the students need to be involved in the lesson and actively participating in activities that include technology. Student engagement is critical to student motivation during the learning process. The more students are motivated to learn, the more likely it is that they will be successful in their efforts. (Beeland, 2002).
Uses of Technology
There are numerous uses of technologies that are available to teachers to include students into the classroom’s lesson. These include Interactive Whiteboards, Proximas, PowerPoint games, interactive DVDs, Ventrilo chat software, Myspace, Blackboard, and scavenger hunts. To put the uses of technology into an effective practice, teachers need to help students set achievable goals; encourage students to assess themselves and their peers; help them to work co-operatively in groups and ensure that they know how to exploit all the available resources for learning (Hall, 2006). The following are how some technology is used to help students learn.
Interactive Whiteboards
There are two different types of whiteboards. The first is a virtual version of a dry erase board. It allows students to see what the instructor or other students write or draw using a special pen. The second functions similar to a normal whiteboard but also contains a projector screen, an electronic copy board or as a computer projector screen on which the computer image can be controlled by touching or writing on the surface of the panel instead of using a mouse or keyboard. They function by connecting a projector to the whiteboard panel with the use of a computer and software. It is important to know the different functions in order to determine which whiteboard is right for the educator. By knowing the difference you can also learn the terminology and understand the basic functions of each.
Proximas and PowerPoint
PowerPoint is a software program that is being used in the classroom as a tool to incorporate learning activities into the curriculum. PowerPoint enables teachers and students to actively create presentations with graphics, charts, diagrams, and pictures in their slideshows to help make often complicated ideas and lessons more manageable and understandable. It is a way for students to engage in research, and present information to their peers. When students are actively learning, taking an active role in the learning process, they seem to understand the information better, and enjoy the lesson. The use of a game also allowed Jones and Mungai to directly address the learning style needs of the visual (58%) and tactile learner (22%), which represents eighty-percent of those involved in the content related courses. When constructed with different learning styles in mind, games can often accelerate the learning process (Jones & Mungai, 2003). By itself PowerPoint is not a cure-all remedy, but rather a tool that needs to be understood and used properly for it to be effective as an active learning tool. It also has shown that students that did use PowerPoint as a learning tool were more engaged in the discussions (Rowcliffe, 2003). This will encourage teachers to use PowerPoint as a way to involve students into a lesson by stimulating discussion. For PowerPoint to take place in a classroom an Interactive Whiteboard or a Proxima is needed. A Proxima displays a computer screen onto a screen much like a projector at a movie theater. The user is able to display items such as websites, PowerPoint, and interactive games. A way for students to interact using this technology is through games created by teachers and used in the PowerPoint lesson. Games such as Hollywood Squares, Jeopardy, and Who Wants to be a Millionaire are created using slides and links to answer the questions. Teachers may use a blank template and fill them with different answers for the students to use as a review. Teachers may even let the students create their own review using the blank templates. This activity can also be used in a small group or team setting.
Advantages to the Students
Learning sciences research tells us that students learn much better “by doing” rather than “by listening.” This means that passive learning – the traditional lecture – is being replaced in our classrooms by more active learning activities that emphasize student problem solving, discussion, presentation and other “authentic” learning-by-doing-activities. (Day, 2004). By including students into the lesson it opens up a realm of possibilities because students can retain roughly only 10% of what they write down.
Teacher Apprehension
So why are teachers not using technology that engages and interacts more frequently with students? There are many reasons why teachers feel apprehensive or uncomfortable using an interactive whiteboard, proxima and PowerPoint. The first of which could be the length of time from their college prep program until now. Teachers often get exposed to and learn new technologies in their teacher prep courses. Some might not have been prepared enough upon entering the workforce. Although the availability of technology in American schools has increased (US Department of Education, 2000), information released by The National Education Association (2004) indicates that less than 35% of public school teachers feel they are "well prepared" or "very well prepared" to use this technology effectively.
The second reason is blockage from the school’s control or security system. Teachers claim that the firewalls and filtering systems create blockage in their attempts to educate and communicate with others with technology (Murray, 2004). The teachers and other users can become frustrated when they do not understand why a certain item like a website used for a scavenger hunt or a hyperlink in a PowerPoint are not available.
The inconsistency from school to school is another reason. At one site there may be access to all different types of technology while at another the absence is very evident. The general public perception is that our schools are using technology and managing our resources in that area well. In several surveys done some schools do show nearly 100 percent use of technology while in others the use of technology is nonexistent (Starr, 2003).
Summary
The research has shown that there are proven benefits to using technology in the classroom. The ability to integrate technology into the classroom can add valuable information and ideas to our students.
By facilitating Proximas, PowerPoint, and interactive whiteboards our teachers will be able to reach a broader audience of learners.
References
Beeland, W.D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive
whiteboards help? Retrieved May 31, 2008, from www.apexavsi.com
Day, J. (2004). Enhancing the classroom learning experience with web lectures. Retrieved May 31, 2008 from http://smartech.gatech.edu/dspace/handle/1853/65
Hall, B. (2008, March 4). Explorations in learning. Message posted to Student Centered Learning, archived at http://secondlanguagewriting.com/explorations/Archives/2006/Jul/Studentcent
eredLearning.html
Jones, D. C. & Mungai, D. (2003). Technology-enabled teaching for maximum learning.
International Journal of Learning, (10), 3491-3501.
Murray, C. (2004). Teachers: Limited time, access cut school tech use [Electronic version] e School news, 1-5
National Education Association. (2004): Technology in Schools. Retrieved May 31, 2008 from
Rowcliffe, S. (2003) Using PowerPoint effectively in science education: lessons
from research and guidance for the classroom. School Science Review 84 (309).
Starr, L. (2003). Encouraging teacher technology use [Electronic Version] Education World, pg 1
US Department of Education. (2000). Internet access in public schools. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistic.
Watch the video related to technology
2007 Lecture by Jason Martell
Help answer the question about technology
What technology will be avaible in the next 5-10 years that is beneficial to society?Technology that society can benefit from. Any ideas. I keep trying to google it but millions of web pages keep popping up. Can you give me a website link explaining about. Please I am so confused on what to do on this project.
Oh, come on, it's just GOTTA be the transporter.
Technology is not bad.
It's how we use it and whether we consider all the consequences before we put it in place. We have not done that in the past. We can't do things that way anymore.
Technology is what we will use to solve the problems that our misuse of it has brought about.
At the same time, we have to realize that sometimes simple technology is the answer. For example, here's a company doing something to save fuel for ocean freighters. It is really low tech, and it works.
http://www.skysails.info/index.php?id=20&L=1
and an American company doing the same thing.
http://www.kiteship.com/
These are parasails for ships. The cost of retrofitting a ship is dirt cheap. About the cost of leasing a large cape size bulk carrier ship for 2 days.
http://www.pluginpartners.org/
Plug in Partners is an advocacy group for plug in hybrid cars. This is what we need now. The average American driver would get 100mpg overall, and could charge the battery overnight, during off peak electricity demand, for $1.
That would get the average commuter back and forth to work, using no gasoline. You would only use gasoline on longer trips.
Here's a new book that demonstrates what we can do to save our planet while benefitting economically from the positive changes.
http://www.earththesequel.com./
"Krupp and Horn have turned the doom and gloom of global warming on its head. Earth: The Sequel makes it crystal clear that we can build a low-carbon economy while unleashing American entrepreneurs to save the planet, putting optimism back into the environmental story."
Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City
Green Wombat is a good site to follow advances being made in alternative energy and electric and PHEV cars etc.
http://blogs.business2.com/greenwombat/
article on creative financing for solar, including what Berkeley is doing
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/solar-temblor-9-big-trends-page10.html
It takes the sting out of the up front cost of installing solar. This is also happening on a corporate level, with companies like Morgan Stanley setting up financing and power purchase agreements for corporations and other large businesses to install solar panels.
Power purchase agreements are how power companies in California, Nevada and Arizona are contracting for solar thermal power plants in the southwest. These PPAs are a very positive move in the right direction.
Here's what's happening on the cutting edge of thin film solar cells and panels
"Nanosolar’s founder and chief executive, Martin Roscheisen, claims to be the first solar panel manufacturer to be able to profitably sell solar panels for less than $1 a watt. That is the price at which solar energy becomes less expensive than coal."
“With a $1-per-watt panel,” he said, “it is possible to build $2-per-watt systems.”
"According to the Energy Department, building a new coal plant costs about $2.1 a watt, plus the cost of fuel and emissions, he said."
from http://www.grinzo.com/energy/index.php/category/solar/
This article shows how we could have a 69% solar electric grid by 2050, building solar power plants in the southwest.
Scientific American A Solar Grand Plan
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan
I don't agree with all the specifics of this proposal, but it is generally a good idea, even if we only do half or a third of what they are recommending.
It's becoming apparent that solar thermal plants are a better idea than the concentrating solar photovoltaic plants that they are emphasizing. And molten salt for storing thermal energy to generate electricity at night from solar plants is looking like the better idea. They propose caverns filled with compressed air. Molten salt only loses about 1% of it's heat over a 24 hour period, and doesn't involve digging all those caverns.
"The same acre can produce 10 times as much energy from wind as it can from corn ethanol, 180,000 miles per acre per year. But both corn ethanol and wind power pale in comparison with solar photovoltaic, which can produce more than 2 million miles worth of transport per acre per year." http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1454/70/
"Solar thermal power plants such as Ausra's generate electricity by driving steam turbines with sunshine. Ausra's solar concentrators boil water with focused sunlight, and produce electricity at prices directly competitive with gas- and coal-fired electric power."
"Solar thermal power plants can store energy during daylight hours and generate power when it's needed. Ausra's power plants collect the sun's energy as heat; Ausra is developing thermal energy storage systems which can store enough heat to run the power plant for up to 20 hours during dark or cloudy periods."
" All of America's needs for electric power – the entire US grid, night and day – can be generated with Ausra's current technology using a square parcel of land 92 miles on a side. For comparison, this is less than 1% of America's deserts, less land than currently in use in the U.S. for coal mines."
"In recent months, PG&E has signed deals for more than a gigawatt of electricity — enough to light more than 750,000 homes — with solar power plant developers. Such power purchase agreements can take more than a year to hammer out and the permitting and construction of a solar power station can take another three to five years."
"The solar thermal industry is in its infancy but utilities like PG&E (PCG), Southern California Edison (EIX) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SRE) have signed several contracts for solar power plants and negotiations for gigawatts more of solar electricity are ongoing."
from Green Wombat
Biomass to methane power also has big potential.
Sewage treatment plants, landfills, farms etc can all use anaerobic digesters to gather methane for power. This methane would eventually develop as things decompose and become greenhouse gas adding to global warming. This kills two birds with one stone. Check out what Environmental Power Corp is doing in this area.
Wind power
"In the US, the American Wind Energy Association forecasts that installed capacity could grow from 11,603 MW today to around 100,000 MW by 2020. In Canada, Emerging Energy Research predicts that installed wind capacity will expand from around 1,500 MW today to around 14,000 MW by 2015."
{from an article at altenergystocks.com by Charles Morand}
We now have a fledgling bioplastics industry which can make plastics from plant material like corn or non food plants like switchgrass. We now use 5-10% of our oil to make plastics, which create huge environmental problems, especially in the oceans.
Most plastic floats near the sea surface where some is mistaken for food by birds and fishes. Plastics are carried by currents and can circulate continually in the open sea. Broken, degraded plastic pieces outweigh surface zooplankton in the central North Pacific by a factor of 6-1. That means six pounds of plastic for every single pound of zooplankton."
DR. Marcus Ericson
http://www.algalita.org/research.html#plastic
http://www.algalita.org/pelagic_plastic.html
"I'd put my money on the sun & solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don't have to wait until oil and coal run out before we tackle that." Thomas Edison, 1931
It's worse, some people cannot even spell "the" online without screwing up.
Thanks to my trusty companion, Hot Rod (an MX-400 Logitech mouse)
I never misspell when I post because of the auto-spellcheck and correction click and I am wise enough to know what word to use.
Poor education and texting is in my mind, the evil source of all this illiteracy. The phone companies should boost the memory capacity of their phones for typing in coherent english or parents should lecture their kids that this is not how you should write a book report and take their phones off them for a month or two.
On the other hand,
New words like "smart phone" "quantum computing" and "fanboy" are entering our language (I do not consider internet gibberish to even qualify for a dictionary EVER)
Communication is faster than ever, you can make friends who live in another country and tell them what hobbies you are into and they send a response in seconds.
I'm holding out hope for voice recognition software to replace the keyboard so that the computer types what you dictate in correct punctuation and spelling with a touch screen manual override in case you are sick with laryngitis or just don't feel like talking to a machine.
The english language is at a crossroads and it is up to us to decide if keeping it "pure" or letting slang and pop culture interact with it is for the best.
@Kamelg Gross** Haha!!
I prefer the original version.
Me encanta esta cancion
@therealallpro the justin timberlake version
which version was first?
well if you think about it, technology makes experiments easy to be tested. You don't really want to wait all day to prove that your hypotheses was right, so technology really helps science. If your trying to prove something or test something, technology makes you life way easier. They're different because technology deals with making life easier and then there's the technical stuff about machinery and ya da ya da. Technology deals with more broader scale than science, it's like more hands on. Technology is cool too. While science is much cooler, Science is been around than technology. But anyway, science deals with everything, from testing an experiment to finding a cure for a disease. Science deals with explanations and experiments.
http://earth.rice.edu/MTPE/hydro/hydrosphere/hydrosphere_how.html
You are correct: it is black light (ultraviolet light).
Check out the links below:
This is a good version, but i prefer the pendulum mix.
I see big advancements in material sciences nanotechnology and the usual advancements in computers for the next 30 years or so: lighter planes, better medical treatments, cheaper stronger structures, faster and faster computer, etc…
One hundred years is a long ways off. I'm not sure but I think the whole doubling processing speeds every1.5 years will breakdown by then and we will be turning to quantum computers that uses the states of subatomic particles instead of binary. Moon bases, American flag on Mars, trans Atlantic subway, space vacations for the wealthy (not super wealthy), more renewable energy power sources, no ice caps, and a Starbucks in everyones hourse =)
Oh, there was that bit in the bible where Jesus turned dihydrogen monoxide into ethyl alcohol… or the part where he walked on surface tension… oh wait… its just a story…………….. P.S. please learn how to use grammar correctly.
Great Smash Hit,the girl in Gold is worth every word of this song!
ez is nagyon tetszik a Kicsimnek !
Establishing budget must be the first step in my opinion. Do you want proprietary hardware and kit in terms of that technology cul de sac that often occurs. What are the requirements in terms of users, is it that boardroom to boardroom type of scenario or is it more about groups / teams not just the management ? To get the best value from the type of activity "video conferencing" you're looking at – think along the lines of – what kit is required (hardware, bandwidth, quality, user interface) what financial foot print from an ongoing point of view. Desktop to boardroom – multipoint video and browser independence for future proofing your solution will address the flexibility aspect of "all" of your company and perhaps everyone your company deals with. The legacy issue is one of the biggest problems companies find themselves in.. who supports your hardware… and how much will that cost? Disclosure: CEO http://www.onlinemeetingrooms.com I'd be thrilled to demonstrate how far 100% independent web browsing quality has come. Hope this helps.
this is total shit, it fuckin sucks it’s one of the worst song of all time (and Ive heard shit from Soulja Boy)