There seems to be an abundance of companies nowadays trying to sell us the latest water purification technology utilizing various different methods of water purification.
Sad to say, many are just not up to scratch in these days of poor water quality and contamination. It is absolutely essential today to protect yourself correctly against the many dangers that lurk in our water.
Remember a study has shown there to be over 2000 toxic substances that can cause cancer in our drinking water, and many methods of water purification leave in too many of these potentially lethal contaminants in.
Water purification technology to avoid is the not so common point-of-use distillation, and the now fading reverse osmosis products. The main pitfalls of these are the fact that they were never intended originally for home use and demineralise your water.
It has been proven that our water supply must contain vital minerals such as calcium and magnesium to promote good health. If we do not get enough of them, our bodies will pull them from other sources like the teeth and bones to compensate. This can lead to health complications as we get older.
For water purification technology to be effective, it must remove the contaminants and leave in those vital minerals.
The star performers on the market today use activated carbon block and granular carbon filters, and utilize a twin or multi-stage filtration process. These are the most common styles of countertop and under-the-sink systems (point of use).
Activated carbon is recognized by the U.S. EPA as the best available technology for filtering out the most toxic of chemicals, and is only found on high-quality water purification technology systems.
These types of filters are proven (and there are very strict government standards that manufacturers have to adhere to when proving their results) to remove 99% of all contaminants, whilst still leaving in those important minerals for good health. These methods of water purification are setting the benchmark now for the rest to follow.
The end result is great tasting, pure healthy water, free from all pollutants. They are also extremely cost effective and simple to maintain.
So what are you waiting for! I hope this has given you some pause for thought, and will spur you on to find the water purification technology that you can count on.
If you would like to learn more about the systems I recommend to use and which to avoid, visit my website.
Watch the video related to technology
Complete video at: fora.tv Peter Hirshberg, co-founder and chairman of The Conversation Group, narrates the historical tensions between art and technology. His projects use crime reports, pollution data, and crowd-sourcing to help bridge the gap between art, technology, and social action. —– DLD is an inspiring community for the 21st century which features digital innovation, science and culture and brings together thought leaders, creators, entrepreneurs and investors from Europe, the Middle-East, the Americas and Asia. This session on maps features Julieta Aranda (E-flux), Rosa Barba (Artist), Peter Hirshberg (The Conversation Group), Alexander Kluge (Director), Aaron Koblin (Google Creative Lab), Philippe Parreno (Artist), Josef Penninger (Austrian Academy of Sciences), Eric Rodenbeck (Stamen), Anri Sala (Artist) Dimitar Sasselov (Harvard Lab for Astrophysics) and Qiu Zhijie (China Academy of Art). Hans Ulrich Obrist (Serpentine Gallery) moderates. – DLD 2010 Peter Hirshberg is at the epicenter of the connected world of online conversation. His interests include about marketing, branding and customer relationships. A Silicon Valley executive with several high-profile marketing and branding related ventures, Hirshberg has led emerging media and technology companies at the center of disruptive change for more than 20 years. He is Chairman and co-founder of The Conversation Group, a fast-growing agency helping brands and enterprises with strategy and marketing in a <b>…</b>
Help answer the question about technology
What positive effects will technology have on our future?When I say technology, I mean things like: Smartphones (able to navigate you to an open parking spot or let you know where traffic is), autonomous vehicles (the driverless cars which particiapted in a 102 mile race completely driven off of its own decisions), and any other piece of technology that may relate to the previous examples.
Oh, come on, it's just GOTTA be the transporter.
Technology is not bad.
It's how we use it and whether we consider all the consequences before we put it in place. We have not done that in the past. We can't do things that way anymore.
Technology is what we will use to solve the problems that our misuse of it has brought about.
At the same time, we have to realize that sometimes simple technology is the answer. For example, here's a company doing something to save fuel for ocean freighters. It is really low tech, and it works.
http://www.skysails.info/index.php?id=20&L=1
and an American company doing the same thing.
http://www.kiteship.com/
These are parasails for ships. The cost of retrofitting a ship is dirt cheap. About the cost of leasing a large cape size bulk carrier ship for 2 days.
http://www.pluginpartners.org/
Plug in Partners is an advocacy group for plug in hybrid cars. This is what we need now. The average American driver would get 100mpg overall, and could charge the battery overnight, during off peak electricity demand, for $1.
That would get the average commuter back and forth to work, using no gasoline. You would only use gasoline on longer trips.
Here's a new book that demonstrates what we can do to save our planet while benefitting economically from the positive changes.
http://www.earththesequel.com./
"Krupp and Horn have turned the doom and gloom of global warming on its head. Earth: The Sequel makes it crystal clear that we can build a low-carbon economy while unleashing American entrepreneurs to save the planet, putting optimism back into the environmental story."
Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City
Green Wombat is a good site to follow advances being made in alternative energy and electric and PHEV cars etc.
http://blogs.business2.com/greenwombat/
article on creative financing for solar, including what Berkeley is doing
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/solar-temblor-9-big-trends-page10.html
It takes the sting out of the up front cost of installing solar. This is also happening on a corporate level, with companies like Morgan Stanley setting up financing and power purchase agreements for corporations and other large businesses to install solar panels.
Power purchase agreements are how power companies in California, Nevada and Arizona are contracting for solar thermal power plants in the southwest. These PPAs are a very positive move in the right direction.
Here's what's happening on the cutting edge of thin film solar cells and panels
"Nanosolar’s founder and chief executive, Martin Roscheisen, claims to be the first solar panel manufacturer to be able to profitably sell solar panels for less than $1 a watt. That is the price at which solar energy becomes less expensive than coal."
“With a $1-per-watt panel,” he said, “it is possible to build $2-per-watt systems.”
"According to the Energy Department, building a new coal plant costs about $2.1 a watt, plus the cost of fuel and emissions, he said."
from http://www.grinzo.com/energy/index.php/category/solar/
This article shows how we could have a 69% solar electric grid by 2050, building solar power plants in the southwest.
Scientific American A Solar Grand Plan
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan
I don't agree with all the specifics of this proposal, but it is generally a good idea, even if we only do half or a third of what they are recommending.
It's becoming apparent that solar thermal plants are a better idea than the concentrating solar photovoltaic plants that they are emphasizing. And molten salt for storing thermal energy to generate electricity at night from solar plants is looking like the better idea. They propose caverns filled with compressed air. Molten salt only loses about 1% of it's heat over a 24 hour period, and doesn't involve digging all those caverns.
"The same acre can produce 10 times as much energy from wind as it can from corn ethanol, 180,000 miles per acre per year. But both corn ethanol and wind power pale in comparison with solar photovoltaic, which can produce more than 2 million miles worth of transport per acre per year." http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1454/70/
"Solar thermal power plants such as Ausra's generate electricity by driving steam turbines with sunshine. Ausra's solar concentrators boil water with focused sunlight, and produce electricity at prices directly competitive with gas- and coal-fired electric power."
"Solar thermal power plants can store energy during daylight hours and generate power when it's needed. Ausra's power plants collect the sun's energy as heat; Ausra is developing thermal energy storage systems which can store enough heat to run the power plant for up to 20 hours during dark or cloudy periods."
" All of America's needs for electric power – the entire US grid, night and day – can be generated with Ausra's current technology using a square parcel of land 92 miles on a side. For comparison, this is less than 1% of America's deserts, less land than currently in use in the U.S. for coal mines."
"In recent months, PG&E has signed deals for more than a gigawatt of electricity — enough to light more than 750,000 homes — with solar power plant developers. Such power purchase agreements can take more than a year to hammer out and the permitting and construction of a solar power station can take another three to five years."
"The solar thermal industry is in its infancy but utilities like PG&E (PCG), Southern California Edison (EIX) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SRE) have signed several contracts for solar power plants and negotiations for gigawatts more of solar electricity are ongoing."
from Green Wombat
Biomass to methane power also has big potential.
Sewage treatment plants, landfills, farms etc can all use anaerobic digesters to gather methane for power. This methane would eventually develop as things decompose and become greenhouse gas adding to global warming. This kills two birds with one stone. Check out what Environmental Power Corp is doing in this area.
Wind power
"In the US, the American Wind Energy Association forecasts that installed capacity could grow from 11,603 MW today to around 100,000 MW by 2020. In Canada, Emerging Energy Research predicts that installed wind capacity will expand from around 1,500 MW today to around 14,000 MW by 2015."
{from an article at altenergystocks.com by Charles Morand}
We now have a fledgling bioplastics industry which can make plastics from plant material like corn or non food plants like switchgrass. We now use 5-10% of our oil to make plastics, which create huge environmental problems, especially in the oceans.
Most plastic floats near the sea surface where some is mistaken for food by birds and fishes. Plastics are carried by currents and can circulate continually in the open sea. Broken, degraded plastic pieces outweigh surface zooplankton in the central North Pacific by a factor of 6-1. That means six pounds of plastic for every single pound of zooplankton."
DR. Marcus Ericson
http://www.algalita.org/research.html#plastic
http://www.algalita.org/pelagic_plastic.html
"I'd put my money on the sun & solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don't have to wait until oil and coal run out before we tackle that." Thomas Edison, 1931
It's worse, some people cannot even spell "the" online without screwing up.
Thanks to my trusty companion, Hot Rod (an MX-400 Logitech mouse)
I never misspell when I post because of the auto-spellcheck and correction click and I am wise enough to know what word to use.
Poor education and texting is in my mind, the evil source of all this illiteracy. The phone companies should boost the memory capacity of their phones for typing in coherent english or parents should lecture their kids that this is not how you should write a book report and take their phones off them for a month or two.
On the other hand,
New words like "smart phone" "quantum computing" and "fanboy" are entering our language (I do not consider internet gibberish to even qualify for a dictionary EVER)
Communication is faster than ever, you can make friends who live in another country and tell them what hobbies you are into and they send a response in seconds.
I'm holding out hope for voice recognition software to replace the keyboard so that the computer types what you dictate in correct punctuation and spelling with a touch screen manual override in case you are sick with laryngitis or just don't feel like talking to a machine.
The english language is at a crossroads and it is up to us to decide if keeping it "pure" or letting slang and pop culture interact with it is for the best.
Pretty informative video! I never got to the theater to see ‘Avatar’ in 3D… wish that I would have set aside the time… purchased the Blu-Ray version on disc…absolutely a magical film! I can’t afford one of those expensive 3D televisions ( just bought a high-definition screen for Blu-Ray),but I sure hope that Cameron isn’t going to release the 3D version just for 3D TV owners… the rest of us would like the experience in 3D as well!
You are correct: it is black light (ultraviolet light).
Check out the links below:
This is the most informative coverage about stereoscopic 3-D i have found from the internets that exist in a news site thus far. Rocketboom should try broadcasting news episode with Molly in 3-D. Seriously. Yes seriously indeed.
@AquaInertia CHEERS MAN,HOW DID YOU REMEMBER THAT!!!!!
I see big advancements in material sciences nanotechnology and the usual advancements in computers for the next 30 years or so: lighter planes, better medical treatments, cheaper stronger structures, faster and faster computer, etc…
One hundred years is a long ways off. I'm not sure but I think the whole doubling processing speeds every1.5 years will breakdown by then and we will be turning to quantum computers that uses the states of subatomic particles instead of binary. Moon bases, American flag on Mars, trans Atlantic subway, space vacations for the wealthy (not super wealthy), more renewable energy power sources, no ice caps, and a Starbucks in everyones hourse =)
well if you think about it, technology makes experiments easy to be tested. You don't really want to wait all day to prove that your hypotheses was right, so technology really helps science. If your trying to prove something or test something, technology makes you life way easier. They're different because technology deals with making life easier and then there's the technical stuff about machinery and ya da ya da. Technology deals with more broader scale than science, it's like more hands on. Technology is cool too. While science is much cooler, Science is been around than technology. But anyway, science deals with everything, from testing an experiment to finding a cure for a disease. Science deals with explanations and experiments.
Oh, there was that bit in the bible where Jesus turned dihydrogen monoxide into ethyl alcohol… or the part where he walked on surface tension… oh wait… its just a story…………….. P.S. please learn how to use grammar correctly.
HEY LEAVE MY GIRL ALONE!!!!……..hahaha
ellie roundtree if that ain’t a porn name nothing is
Establishing budget must be the first step in my opinion. Do you want proprietary hardware and kit in terms of that technology cul de sac that often occurs. What are the requirements in terms of users, is it that boardroom to boardroom type of scenario or is it more about groups / teams not just the management ? To get the best value from the type of activity "video conferencing" you're looking at – think along the lines of – what kit is required (hardware, bandwidth, quality, user interface) what financial foot print from an ongoing point of view. Desktop to boardroom – multipoint video and browser independence for future proofing your solution will address the flexibility aspect of "all" of your company and perhaps everyone your company deals with. The legacy issue is one of the biggest problems companies find themselves in.. who supports your hardware… and how much will that cost? Disclosure: CEO http://www.onlinemeetingrooms.com I'd be thrilled to demonstrate how far 100% independent web browsing quality has come. Hope this helps.
Move over Viewmaster! I think 3D will only go mainstream when it can be achieved without the need of special glasses or headgear. Until then it’s going to be a novelty.
I’d say autostereoscopic techniques (particularly multiview parallax barrier) will win out over the current trends simply because people would rather see 3D without needing to wear silly-looking glasses.
Plus, with the release of FujiFilm’s parllax barrier camera and the more media-saturated Nintendo 3DS, autostereoscopic displays will be getting much more press coverage very soon. And any business(wo)man knows more press equals more popularity.
-IMP
http://earth.rice.edu/MTPE/hydro/hydrosphere/hydrosphere_how.html
allo’ sugar tits
@endocomar93 That was not a real hologram. That was digital CGI with a greenscreen. The only technological advance there was the synchronization of the cameras filming the “holographic” person with the digital insertion of his image. The people in the studio didn’t see the hologram, only the viewers at home. Because it wasn’t really a hologram.
-IMP
